Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Through my friend Melissa's blog I came across this Vancouver Sun article about a woman who is trying to sell her breastmilk, and was kicked off Craigslist.

I have my own opinions about the best ways to ensure human milk for human babies, which are not necessarily shared by those in the breastfeeding world or those in the business of formula production (not that I actually know anyone in the business of making formula!).

Basically, at this point, and unless I learn something new that changes what I think, it is my opinion that there should be a company that makes breastmilk available at a reasonable cost (and buys breastmilk from lactating women) with regulations in place so that certain ethical standards are maintained. I think that a company operating on a business model on a wide scale could offer serious competition to the formual companies and, most importantly, offer the BEST nutrition option to babies whose own parents aren't able to breastfeed them, for whatever reason.

Here's the comment I left on the article:

I understand there are ethical issues around buying and selling breastmilk, for instance, is the breastmilk truly breastmilk and/or undiluted, is the lactating woman compromising her own infant's health by selling so much of her breastmilk that her own baby doesn't get enough? When money is involved, profit can often outweigh common sense and ethical standards.

HOWEVER, and I think this is huge, there are ways to solve these problems AND GET HUMAN BABIES HUMAN MILK.

I think Eats on Feets is one great solution, but it might not work for everyone.

I also think that the value of breastmilk is so great that we actually can't even calculate it, and the time and effort that women put into pumping milk, as well as the toll on their bodies, should not be ignored. Women's contributions to society have generally been undervalued or distorted, especially pregnancy, birthing, mothering, and lactating. It is my opinion that paying women for breastmilk that they donate is part of recognizing how valuable this resource is for babies, not just for the present but for continued health into the rest of those babies' lives.

What I would like to see is either government or an individual company create regulations around purchasing and sellling breastmilk. I think with the right standards in place, ethical issues could be solved and breastmilk could become a real competitor for formula.

In the meantime, Eats on Feets is an excellent solution for those who are comfortable with mother-to-mother milk sharing.

Both donating and selling breastmilk has been around since women and babies. A lactating family member or friend would often breastfeed babies whose mothers were not able to or who were not around, and wet nurses were paid for their services.

4 comments:

melissa said...

Interesting idea, though I'm not totally on board with actually attaching monetary value or capitalist involvement with women's productive capacity for breastmilk, but I DO like the idea of producing an actual competitor for formula companies: that would go further than the WHO code in implementing ethical standards, IMO, because there would be a superior competitive product out there...

Do you remember the Dionne Quintuplets from Quebec? They were taken from their parents and fed donated breastmilk for the first few months of their lives, and it's what saved them because they were premature and very tiny in an era before NICUs and high tech equipment. Women from all over the province collected and donated their milk for these babies. So cool.

mamachurchmouse said...

Hi there. Found this post really interesting. I'm not sure which ethical issues you're referring to that could be taken care of by sufficient regulations. Or maybe I have less confidence in human governments, especially in the longterm. I think it's an issue where if you give an inch, time, and the changing habits of a societies though on a matter, will take a mile.

When I think of the possibility of putting a price on human milk my mind follows the implications down the road of natural human tendencies and I get visions of underpriveleged women hooked up to breastpumps all day in a kind of dystopian human dairy farm. I think it would be very hard for any regulatory board to control the greed and willingness to devalue human beings which exists in the world and would find a way to make a profit on the backs of disadvantaged families and women, perhaps even in other countries where our ethical standards and regulations would have even less weight. And at the expense of the progress we have made and continue to fight to make to protect women's rights and dignity worldwide. Attaching monetary value to human milk would be a severe blow.

I think there is a big difference between paying a wetnurse as done in olden days (not unlike your arrangement with your helper--a mutually benificial sharing of resources) and the buying and selling of breastmilk as a product.

I foresee a frightening future economy in which the rich buy breastmilk for their babies from poor women who are forced to feed their own babies cheaper formula in order to make a living.

Just my two cents. :) I'm all for breastmilk sharing though!

Asheya said...

The reality is that *any* product considered to be valuable will always be available for purchase on the blackmarket, underground, or simply in an unregulated fashion (whether ethical or not). Marijuana is the product that instantly springs to my mind. Breastmilk is currently being sold and bought in an unregulated fashion, some for good purposes, some not so good, and I don't know anything about the women behind it. (i.e. cheese and ice cream made from breastmilk. Yes, it exists and you can buy it.)

The regulations I am referring to would apply to a company that set itself up to buy and sell breastmilk on a large scale with the purpose of providing competition for infant formula.

For instance, the company could have a policy that any individual woman is only allowed to provide x amount of breastmilk per month for purchase by the company; anything after that could be a donation. This would limit the possible abuse of selling breastmilk while the woman's own child is not getting enough or the woman is getting too depleted.

Or, you could allow woman to sell as much breastmilk to the company as they wanted, as long as each month they provided a certificate of good health for their own breastfeeding child from a Canadian doctor (or a death certificate if their baby has died and that is why they have milk and are selling it). The company would have to be able to search Canadian birth registries for each woman donating, in order to make sure they have all the information about the child or children the woman has given birth to under the age of, say, 6 months at the time of application.

I would also think there is a test you could do to verify that the milk from each donor actually belongs to that woman, such as a DNA marker test. I did these in biology lab in university with only some skin cells from my own cheek, so I cannot imagine they are not too expensive or too difficult. This would ensure that each donation of milk is actually from the woman that you have information about.

A lot of hoops, perhaps, but these are strategies that could ensure ethical buying and selling of breastmilk.

To prevent the woman selling her milk/buying cheaper formula problem, the company would have to price breastmilk below formula, and of course pay a woman less for her breastmilk than it costs to buy formula. This would then ensure that it would make no sense financially for a woman to sell her breastmilk and feed her own infant formula.

I'm not convinced that selling breastmilk on a large scale would diminish women's rights--in fact I think in a regulated system it would lead to a greater valuing of women, and a recognition that perhaps doesn't really exist that women are life-givers, and no one else has the capacity to produce the essential food for nurturing infant human life, and indeed for creating that life in the first place.

Our society greatly undervalues women's contributions as mothers: it's not paid work, therefore staying home with your children is taking a leave from work, rather than working outside the home being taking a leave from your family. Do you see what I'm getting at?

Asheya said...

I think it's very important that women have the same opportunities for careers and pay etc. that men do, but I think it's equally important that women are valued for the things that ONLY WOMEN CAN DO. We as a society place value on what men do, which is why it is acceptable for women to move into traditionally men's spheres (the workplace, sports, trades etc.) and dress in 'men's' clothes (pants etc.) but it is unacceptable for men to wear dresses, make-up etc. and considered a bit strange if a dad wants to stay at home (although that is becoming more common).

So I think that actually paying a woman for something that only a woman's body can produce is attaching value in a way that our culture understands to the significant contributions women make as mothers and breastfeeding mothers.

So those are my ideas and the philosophical reasons behind them. I'd love to hear your response!